Battlecard

pmkit vs Nalin

Nalin is a conversational PM copilot. pmkit is a workflow engine with structured jobs, draft-only governance, and enterprise integrations.

Structured Workflows vs Chat

Wins
  • Seven pre-built PM workflows that run end-to-end
  • Consistent, repeatable outputs every time
  • Scheduled jobs run without prompting
Risks
  • Nalin offers flexible, conversational interactions
  • Less adaptable to ad-hoc questions
Counterpunch

Chat is great for exploration, but PM work needs consistency. Your daily brief should look the same every day, not depend on how you phrase the prompt.

Draft-Only Governance

Wins
  • All external writes are proposals for human review
  • Full audit trail of every tool call and artifact
  • RBAC controls who can approve what
Risks
  • Nalin can take direct actions faster
  • Approval workflow adds steps
Counterpunch

Speed without governance is how you spam Slack channels and create duplicate Jira tickets. pmkit is fast enough with guardrails.

Enterprise Integrations

Wins
  • MCP connectors for Jira, Confluence, Slack, Gong, Zendesk
  • Standardized tool protocol for adding new connectors
  • Audit logging for every API call
Risks
  • Nalin may have different integration options
  • MCP is a newer protocol
Counterpunch

MCP is the emerging standard for AI tool integration. Building on MCP means pmkit connectors work with the broader AI ecosystem.

The Bottom Line

Use Nalin if you want a conversational AI assistant for ad-hoc PM questions and brainstorming.

Use pmkit if you need structured workflows that run consistently, with governance and audit trails for enterprise teams.

See Structured Workflows

Run all seven PM jobs in the demo and experience consistent, repeatable outputs.